tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921470344483575604.post7936555071928989834..comments2023-08-24T06:30:08.969-04:00Comments on VoiceCerts.com - CCIE Collaboration | CCIE Voice | CCNP Voice | CCNA Voice: Overview of the G.722 Wideband CodecDavid Holmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11238191012044383600noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921470344483575604.post-15706602898742177592011-04-21T17:07:35.467-04:002011-04-21T17:07:35.467-04:00Joe,
See the thread here: https://supportforums....Joe, <br /><br />See the thread here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3301673<br /><br />Without seeing your configs and topology, it's difficult to nail this down with certainty, but it usually boils down to the PSTN not supporting G.722. When you disabled G.722, everything end-to-end used G.711. If disabling G.722 allowed the transfer to work, I'd expect either a lack or exhaustion of transcoding services from G.722 to G.711 somewhere.David Holmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11238191012044383600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921470344483575604.post-66272132559959056692011-04-20T09:14:10.933-04:002011-04-20T09:14:10.933-04:00I just ran into an issue where we tried to do a su...I just ran into an issue where we tried to do a supervised transfer that failed. Call came in to secretary from the outside, she hit transfer to her boss's phone, he answered and she told him there was someone on the line for him, and when she hung up the call dropped.<br /><br />Before she hung up for the transfer to go through, I checked on her boss's phone and noticed the connection between boss and secretary was using G722.<br /><br />I disabled G722 via the service parameter, and it worked fine.<br /><br />Can you explain to me what was going on with this? Probably the gateway didn't support G722?Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13211066446910585429noreply@blogger.com